Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-05-01 | 2019-03-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 433.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X25 MT6797T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (100 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2560mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K40 is a little bit better than the Meizu Pro 6, getting a 69.8 score against 63.5. The LG K40 is a way newer and just a little lighter phone than the Meizu Pro 6, but it is somewhat thicker. Meizu Pro 6 features a little bit better display than LG K40, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
LG K40 has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K40 features a little faster processor than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Meizu Pro 6 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG K40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG K40 features a little longer battery duration than Meizu Pro 6, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2560mAh.
LG K40 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.