Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-01 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Champagne pink and Midnight blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 433.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X25 MT6797T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (100 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2560mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto E (2020) has an overall score of 69.7, which is a bit better than Meizu Pro 6's score of 63.5. The Motorola Moto E (2020) is a notably newer cellphone than the Meizu Pro 6, although it's thicker and heavier. Motorola Moto E (2020) counts with a bit better performance than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Meizu Pro 6 has a much better looking screen than Moto E (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. Meizu Pro 6 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Moto E (2020), because although it has an external memory slot that holds up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory.
The Moto E (2020) features a really longer battery performance than Meizu Pro 6, because it has a 39 percent more battery size. The Meizu Pro 6 takes better photographs and videos than Moto E (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a way better 21 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto E (2020) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.