Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2016-05-01 | 2012-05-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 433.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X25 MT6797T chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (100 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2560mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III has a global score of 69.7, which is just a bit better than Meizu Pro 6's global score of 63.5. The Samsung Galaxy S III design is somewhat lighter than the Meizu Pro 6, but it's somewhat thicker and was released 4 years before. Galaxy S III has just a little better processing power than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and more CPU cores (although they are slower).
Samsung Galaxy S III features a bit more vivid display than Meizu Pro 6, although it has a quite smaller screen, much less pixels per inch in the display and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720px. The Meizu Pro 6 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Meizu Pro 6 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
The Meizu Pro 6 has greater battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has 2560mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S III is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.