Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 433.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X25 MT6797T chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (100 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2560mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than Meizu Pro 6, having an 81 score against 63.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer than Meizu Pro 6's, but it's extremely heavier and extremely thicker. Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid screen than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better performance than Meizu Pro 6, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more CPU cores (although slower). The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Meizu Pro 6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Meizu Pro 6 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Meizu Pro 6, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.