Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.79 x 3.01 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 225 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the Micromax A110 Canvas 2, having a general score of 81.3 against 47.1. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little lighter and a lot thinner phone than Micromax A110 Canvas 2. LG V35 ThinQ has a really superior hardware performance than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better looking display than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a larger display and a much higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better camera than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior battery life than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Micromax A110 Canvas 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.