Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | ZTE |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-09-19 |
| 5.79 x 3.01 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 196 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.74 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 225 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Tempo X is a little bit better than the Micromax A110 Canvas 2, having a score of 51.7 against 47.1. The ZTE Tempo X is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the Micromax A110 Canvas 2. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Tempo X has the newer 7.1 Nougat version and Micromax A110 Canvas 2 has Android 4.1.
Micromax A110 Canvas 2 counts with a better display than ZTE Tempo X. Both of them have a greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen, the same exact resolution of 854 x 480 pixels and a display with the same size. ZTE Tempo X features a little bit better performance than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 512 MB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Micromax A110 Canvas 2 has a slightly better camera than ZTE Tempo X, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels. ZTE Tempo X has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Tempo X counts with a bit superior battery life than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, ZTE Tempo X is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.