Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 280 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, getting a global score of 81.3 against 48.4. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior CPU than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better looking display than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a bigger display and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V35 ThinQ captures a lot better pictures and videos than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better battery duration than Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Micromax A110Q Canvas 2 plus, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.