Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 225 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, getting an 82.5 score against 42.8. The Google Pixel 2 XL has an incredibly better looking display than Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a bigger screen and a much higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, although it has no SD extension slot. Google Pixel 2 XL features a more powerful processor than Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 XL shoots way better photos and videos than Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, because it has a way better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a way better battery performance than Micromax A115 Canvas 3D, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.