Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.5 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 206,85 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.8 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a lot better than Micromax A26 Bolt's 34.6 score. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a way better screen than Micromax A26 Bolt, because it has a way larger display, a much greater screen density and a way better 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Micromax A26 Bolt, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures much better photographs and videos than Micromax A26 Bolt. Galaxy S9 has much more storage to install applications and games than Micromax A26 Bolt, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery duration than Micromax A26 Bolt, because it has a 122 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than Micromax A26 Bolt, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.