Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 40.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.5 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Spreadtrum SC6820 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 163,84 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 175 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the Micromax A35 Bolt, having a overall score of 80.7 against 40.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version while Micromax A35 Bolt has Android 2.3.5, so it provides the user some additional features.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid display than Micromax A35 Bolt, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1920 x 1080 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Micromax A35 Bolt, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 64 GB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior hardware performance than Micromax A35 Bolt, because it has more cpu cores, a higher amount of RAM memory and an extra graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Micromax A35 Bolt, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Micromax A35 Bolt, because it has a much higher 13 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Micromax A35 Bolt, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.