Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.7 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.67 x 2.46 x 0.50 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 832 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.11 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 140 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is way better than the Micromax A51 Bolt's 40.3 overall score. Galaxy S9 is a a lot thinner but heavier phone than Micromax A51 Bolt. Galaxy S9 features a very superior processor than Micromax A51 Bolt, because it has 3,75 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better looking display than Micromax A51 Bolt, because it has a lot greater display density, a much larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Micromax A51 Bolt, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Micromax A51 Bolt, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes much better videos and photos than Micromax A51 Bolt, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than Micromax A51 Bolt, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.