Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is way better than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2's 47.2 overall score. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a much better memory for games and applications than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, although it has no external memory slot. The Google Pixel 3 features a better performing processor than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, because it has 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3 features a very superior camera than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Google Pixel 3 has a very superior battery duration than Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, because it has a 46 percent bigger battery size.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than the Micromax Canvas Elanza 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.