Compare phones
HTC EVO 4G
PC36100| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 50.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 |
| -- | 2010-03-23 |
| -- | 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.50 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| CSTN | TFT |
| 187 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 7.47 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 4.6 | 3.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 6 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC EVO 4G has a score of 50.3, which is slightly better than Micromax Canvas Entice's score of 45.8. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the HTC EVO 4G has the previous 2.3 version while Micromax Canvas Entice has Android 4.4.2 version. The Micromax Canvas Entice has just a bit better performance than HTC EVO 4G, and although they both have 512 MB of RAM memory, the Micromax Canvas Entice also has a much better GPU and a greater number of cores.
The Micromax Canvas Entice counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC EVO 4G, because although it has a bit lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 800 x 480px, the Micromax Canvas Entice also counts with a bigger display. Micromax Canvas Entice shoots slightly better photos and videos than HTC EVO 4G, although it has a worse 1280x720 video resolution and a back camera with a way worse resolution.
HTC EVO 4G features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Micromax Canvas Entice one, both of them have a SD memory slot that admits up to 32 GB. The Micromax Canvas Entice features longer battery life than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a 1900mAh battery size.
The HTC EVO 4G is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.