Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 25 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 210 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a lot better than the Micromax Canvas Gold's general score of 57.8. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Micromax Canvas Gold, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with more RAM.
Micromax Canvas Gold counts with a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit smaller display. LG V35 ThinQ features a greater camera than Micromax Canvas Gold. They have a same resolution camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Micromax Canvas Gold, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ features a really longer battery lifetime than Micromax Canvas Gold, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Micromax Canvas Gold, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.