Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| -- | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| White | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 280 hours standby time 9.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is way better than Micromax Canvas Hue, having a general score of 81.9 against 51.2. The Galaxy S8 Active has a quite superior performance than Micromax Canvas Hue, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit better looking display than Micromax Canvas Hue, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S8 Active features a lot better camera than Micromax Canvas Hue, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Micromax Canvas Hue, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features better battery duration than Micromax Canvas Hue, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Micromax Canvas Hue.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.