Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 180 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo's overall score of 49.2. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much higher display pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ has a really longer battery lifetime than Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, because it has a 65% greater battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Micromax Canvas Knight Cameo, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.