Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| werVR SGX544MP GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1,43 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (15 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 255 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the Micromax Canvas XL2, with a global score of 81.3 against 47.1. The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a better looking display than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a much better video resolution and a back camera with a way higher resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with improved battery lifetime than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2500mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Micromax Canvas XL2, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.