Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.68 x 2.58 x 0.46 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1560mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a lot better than Lumia 532's 58.5 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ is a heavier but much thinner device than Lumia 532. The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite superior hardware performance than Microsoft Lumia 532, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a much higher pixels number per inch of display and a lot bigger display. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has 56 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better battery duration than Lumia 532, because it has a 112% bigger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has a much bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than Microsoft Lumia 532, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.