Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 64.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 4.1.2, 4.0, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2011-10-18 |
| 4.68 x 2.58 x 0.46 inches | 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.81 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Kevlar |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 169.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Advanced |
| 233 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | TI OMAP4430 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (120 fps) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1560mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20.9 hours talk time | 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time |
| 3.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid RAZR is a little bit better than the Lumia 532, having a score of 64.3 against 58.5. Motorola Droid RAZR comes with Android 4.1.2 OS, and Lumia 532 has Windows Phone 8.1 OS. Motorola Droid RAZR's design is thinner and just a bit lighter than the Lumia 532. The Microsoft Lumia 532 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid RAZR, because although it has a weaker graphics processing unit working at 400 megahertz, and they both have 1 GB of RAM, the Microsoft Lumia 532 also counts with 2 more cores.
Motorola Droid RAZR features a bit sharper display than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has a little higher 960 x 540 resolution, a bit larger screen and a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Motorola Droid RAZR features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lumia 532, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 16 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Droid RAZR features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Lumia 532, because it has a 1780mAh battery capacity against 1560mAh. The Motorola Droid RAZR captures much clearer photos and videos than Lumia 532, and although they both have a F2.4 camera aperture, the Motorola Droid RAZR also has a much more MP back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Droid RAZR is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.