Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| 2015-04-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 26.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Lumia 540 Dual, with an 81.3 score against 58.7. The LG V35 ThinQ design is notably newer and incredibly thinner than the Lumia 540 Dual's, but it is a little bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with an extremely better CPU than Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bigger display and a lot better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot larger aperture to take better low light images. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Lumia 540 Dual, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.