Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 61.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Acer |
| -- | Windows 10 Mobile |
| 2015-11-25 | 2016-07-18 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | -- |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 2.32 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 2870mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Lumia 950 XL has a global score of 74.7, which is a lot better than Acer Liquid Jade Primo's 61.7 score. The Lumia 950 XL construction is just a bit thinner but a bit heavier than the Acer Liquid Jade Primo, and they were released with only 8 months difference. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a higher display pixel density and a little bigger display.
The Lumia 950 XL counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL features a little faster processing unit than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL also has a higher number of cores.
Lumia 950 XL features just a bit better battery lifetime than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because it has a 3340mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh. The Lumia 950 XL counts with a very superior camera than Acer Liquid Jade Primo, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Lumia 950 XL is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.