Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Lumia 950 XL, getting an 82.9 score against 75. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a heavier device than Lumia 950 XL, but both are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a better performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more cores.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a bit less pixels per screen inch and a little smaller screen. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 200 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3340mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a lot more money than Lumia 950 XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.