Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a score of 82.2, which is a bit better than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL's 75 general score. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a a lot thinner and lighter device than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with Android 14 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 XL comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS.
The Lumia 950 XL counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 13 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores. Lumia 950 XL has a way better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel amount per inch of display and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Lumia 950 XL shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much better battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.