Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Lumia 950 XL, with an 81.3 score against 75. LG V35 ThinQ's body is notably newer, just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Lumia 950 XL. The Lumia 950 XL counts with a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller display, a little lower display density and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a better performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Lumia 950 XL has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Lumia 950 XL also counts with a higher 20 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
LG V35 ThinQ's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Lumia 950 XL, although the LG V35 ThinQ has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.