Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition is a bit better than the Lumia 950 XL, having a score of 76.4 against 75. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition construction is newer, a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Lumia 950 XL. The Lumia 950 XL features a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Lumia 950 XL also counts with a little bigger display.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit more powerful processing unit than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Lumia 950 XL counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a smaller camera aperture, a worse (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a worse 20 megapixels resolution. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a little bit longer battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3340mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.