Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL's overall score of 75. The Motorola One Action design is way newer, but thicker and just a little bit heavier than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Motorola One Action counts with a little better processing power than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
Lumia 950 XL has a much better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit greater screen pixels density. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola One Action counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action features just a little better battery duration than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3340mAh.
Motorola One Action is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.