Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than Lumia 950 XL, getting an 80.7 score against 75. Motorola One Vision's body is way newer, but just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than Lumia 950 XL. The Lumia 950 XL has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit better display pixel density.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit better CPU than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One Vision counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Motorola One Vision shoots better pictures and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.