Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is slightly better than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, having a 75.8 score against 75. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a extremely newer cellphone than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, but it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The nubia Red Magic 3S comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and Microsoft Lumia 950 XL comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a faster processing unit than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a better camera than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Lumia 950 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Lumia 950 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get the Lumia 950 XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.