Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 13 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is better than Lumia 950 XL, getting an 82.9 score against 75. The Galaxy A34 body is a lot thinner and way lighter than the Lumia 950 XL. The Galaxy A34 works with Android 13 operating system, while Lumia 950 XL has Windows 10 Mobile operating system. The Galaxy A34 has a superior processing power than Lumia 950 XL, because it has more RAM and more cpu cores.
The Lumia 950 XL features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a way better battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Lumia 950 XL takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.