Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than Lumia 950 XL, with a 79.4 score against 75. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 OS, and Lumia 950 XL works with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a notably heavier phone than the Lumia 950 XL, but they have the same thickness. Microsoft Lumia 950 XL features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory.
The Lumia 950 XL features a more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G captures better videos and photos than Lumia 950 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3340mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.