Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, getting a 91.3 score against 75. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a much newer phone than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comes with Android 12 operating system, and Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite superior performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Lumia 950 XL has a sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixels number in each screen inch.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Lumia 950 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery life than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3340mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.