Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Lumia 950 XL's 75 score. Galaxy Fold's design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but also a lot heavier than Lumia 950 XL. Galaxy Fold counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while Lumia 950 XL works with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a quite superior performance than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM. The Lumia 950 XL features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a lot tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 20 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy Fold counts with longer battery duration than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.