Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, with a overall score of 98 against 75. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with Android 13 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 XL comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is extremely newer than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL's, but it is a little bit thicker and much heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better performing CPU than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3340mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Lumia 950 XL, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.