Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL's general score of 75. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's construction is noticeably heavier but just a bit thinner than the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE comes with Android 14 operating system, and Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Lumia 950 XL features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Microsoft Lumia 950 XL takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos.
Galaxy S24 FE has a much longer battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3340mAh.
Although Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Lumia 950 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Lumia 950 XL. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Lumia 950 XL, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.