Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Apple |
| Windows 10 Mobile | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.19 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than Lumia 950, with a score of 93.3 against 74.1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Lumia 950 counts with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro body is way newer and just a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than Lumia 950. Microsoft Lumia 950 features just a bit better display than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of faster cores, a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM. Lumia 950 counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Lumia 950 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
The iPhone 13 Pro has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
IPhone 13 Pro costs a lot more money than the Lumia 950, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.