Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Apple |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.19 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Lumia 950's score of 74.1. Apple iPhone X is a much newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Lumia 950, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Lumia 950 counts with just a bit better looking display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little greater pixel number per screen inch.
The iPhone X counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X has a much faster CPU than Lumia 950, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone X also has a 64 bits processor and a greater number of cores.
Lumia 950 features a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Lumia 950 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Lumia 950 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Microsoft Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Microsoft Lumia 950. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Microsoft Lumia 950, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.