Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Asus |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2018-10-29 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone has a general score of 77.1, which is slightly better than Lumia 950's general score of 74.1. Asus ROG Phone's body is much newer, but a lot heavier and a bit thicker than Lumia 950. The Lumia 950 features a more vivid display than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Asus ROG Phone has a more powerful processor than Lumia 950, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. Lumia 950 shoots way better photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Lumia 950 also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Asus ROG Phone features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Lumia 950, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone features improved battery performance than Lumia 950, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Lumia 950. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Lumia 950, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.