Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than the Microsoft Lumia 950's global score of 74.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Microsoft Lumia 950, but both are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4 counts with a better performance than Lumia 950, because it has more cores and more RAM.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 features a much better display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. Microsoft Lumia 950 features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB.
The Lumia 950 has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Microsoft Lumia 950 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Microsoft Lumia 950 also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Google Pixel 4 is a little more expensive than Microsoft Lumia 950, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.