Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is better than Lumia 950's general score of 74.1. The Google Pixel 4a is a a little lighter phone than Lumia 950, but they are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 operating system, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Google Pixel 4a features a better processing power than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. The Lumia 950 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Microsoft Lumia 950 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Microsoft Lumia 950 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 4a has more storage for games and applications than Lumia 950, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a has a little better battery duration than Lumia 950, because it has a 3140mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit more expensive than Lumia 950, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.