Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than Lumia 950, having an 82.7 score against 74.1. The LG G8X ThinQ design is way newer, but just a little bit thicker and much heavier than the Lumia 950. LG G8X ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Lumia 950 has a brighter display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display density.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a better processor than Lumia 950, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Lumia 950, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
Lumia 950 counts with a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Lumia 950 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot higher 20 megapixels resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with improved battery life than Lumia 950, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.