Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-06 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than Lumia 950, getting an 82.5 score against 74.1. LG V30S ThinQ counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS, and Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile OS. The LG V30S ThinQ design is notably newer and just a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than Lumia 950. The Microsoft Lumia 950 has a brighter screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a greater processing power than Lumia 950, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Lumia 950, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Lumia 950 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Lumia 950 also counts with a more megapixels back camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit longer battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Lumia 950. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Lumia 950, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.