Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Microsoft Lumia 950's general score of 74.1. LG V35 ThinQ's body is much newer and a bit thinner than the Microsoft Lumia 950's, but it's a little bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite superior hardware performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Lumia 950 has a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Microsoft Lumia 950 takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Microsoft Lumia 950 also counts with a camera with more MP and a much larger sensor.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 950, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.