Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Lumia 950's global score of 74.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra comes with Android 14 operating system, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than the Lumia 950, but it's noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker.
Microsoft Lumia 950 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Lumia 950 have extremely similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way worse pixels number per inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.