Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power is a little bit better than the Microsoft Lumia 950, getting a global score of 76.1 against 74.1. Moto G Power counts with Android 11 operating system, and Microsoft Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system. The Moto G Power body is much newer, but notably heavier and thicker than the Microsoft Lumia 950.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Lumia 950, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Lumia 950 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The Lumia 950 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Lumia 950 also counts with a higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Moto G Power features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with a much better battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola Moto G Power not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.