Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than the Lumia 950's 74.1 global score. Moto G200 5G's design is notably newer, but way heavier and a little bit thicker than the Lumia 950. Moto G200 5G counts with Android 11 OS, while Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Lumia 950 counts with a better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a greater hardware performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a very superior battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.