Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Lumia 950's 74.1 general score. Moto Z Force's body is newer and thinner than Lumia 950's, but it is just a bit heavier. Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system, while Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit better processing power than Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Lumia 950 has a better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Lumia 950 also counts with a little higher pixels amount per inch of screen.
Lumia 950 has a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a tinier aperture, a worse 20 MP resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
Moto Z Force has just a bit longer battery performance than Lumia 950, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Moto Z Force is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.