Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Lumia 950, with a score of 79.8 against 74.1. The Motorola One Hyper design is a lot newer, but a little thicker and noticeably heavier than Lumia 950. The Motorola One Hyper counts with Android 11 OS, while Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile OS.
The Motorola One Hyper has a superior CPU than Lumia 950, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Lumia 950 has a much sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixel quantity per screen inch.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way more megapixels back facing camera. The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper counts with longer battery duration than Lumia 950, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper costs a little more than the Lumia 950, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.