Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than Lumia 950's score of 74.1. The Motorola One Zoom construction is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and much heavier than the Lumia 950. Lumia 950 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lumia 950, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Zoom has a better performing processing unit than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with improved battery life than Lumia 950, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola One Zoom costs a lot more than the Microsoft Lumia 950, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.