Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 15 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 565 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Lumia 950, having a 79.2 score against 74.1. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 OS, while Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a newer and thinner device than Lumia 950, although it is incredibly heavier.
Lumia 950 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
Lumia 950 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM memory and 7 lesser CPU cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than Lumia 950, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos, a much better video quality and a lot higher resolution back camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery duration than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.