Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Nokia |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than Lumia 950's overall score of 74.1. The Nokia XR20 body is newer than Lumia 950's, but it is way thicker and heavier. The Nokia XR20 has Android 11 OS, while Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Nokia XR20 has a more powerful CPU than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Lumia 950 features a better looking display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch. Nokia XR20 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video, a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, faster video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Nokia XR20 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Lumia 950, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Microsoft Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Microsoft Lumia 950. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Microsoft Lumia 950, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.